Evangelicals Place Great Emphasis on the Experience of Being Born Again.

اسفند ۲۷, ۱۴۰۰ ارسال یک نظر




	What does it hateful to be an evangelical? Is George W. Bush an evangelical? Here are the views of Wheaton College historian Marking Noll; Richard Cizik of the National Association of Evangelicals; Steve Waldman, editor-in-chief of Beliefnet; and Amy Black and Alan Jacobs, professors at Wheaton College.


	National Clan of Evangelicals …I think that George Gallup's definition is probably pretty good. He says that evangelicals are those who, get-go of all, believe the Bible is authoritative. It's infallible. This is a theological distinction which separates evangelicals from, say, mainline Protestantism, which more often than not veers from that kind of designation of the Bible as the administrative word of God. I think there'south i mode to understand the evangelical view of the Bible. It is viewed as the objective administrative word of God, as opposed to the mainline Protestant view chosen neo-orthodoxy which holds, you see, that the Bible becomes the word of God in a kind of existential encounter with it. So that'southward the distinction. It doesn't simply become the discussion of God when you have an experience with God or an experience with the Word. It is objectively, authoritatively the discussion of God. That's what distinguishes evangelicals from, say, mainline Protestants. Let's talk about the second tenet. Evangelicals are also people of faith in the American Protestant customs who believe that you must be built-in once more. As Jesus said to Nicodemus in John 3:3, "You must be born again." And Nicodemus said, "Well, should I go dorsum into my mother'due south womb?" And Jesus said, "No. But you have to exist born of the h2o and the spirit." In other words, y'all accept to take your centre changed by him, by Jesus. Bluntly, millions of Americans, unbeknownst to some people in New York and other elitist institutions, actually accept had this kind of experience. Their hearts "have been warmed," equally John Wesley said, by Jesus Christ, who lives today and reigns over matters private and matters public. That's what evangelicals believe.	+ A Survey on America's Evangelicals This April 2004 survey offers the views of evangelicals on society, culture, and politics. Conducted for PBS'southward "Religion and Ideals Newsweekly" and U.South. News & Earth Study, the survey establish: • Evangelicals feel clashing toward American guild. Three-fourths say they feel part of the mainstream, merely an equal number feel they accept to struggle to get their signal of view across. • 72 percent of evangelicals believe the mass media are hostile to their moral and spiritual values; 48 percent believe evangelical Christians are looked down upon past most Americans. • 71 percent of evangelicals polled said they would vote for George W. Bush-league if the ballot were held at present. + America's Evangelicals An in-depth 4-function series by "Religion and Ethics Newsweekly" on evangelicals and their growing political and social influence.


	Assistant professor,Wheaton Higher When I recollect of a definition of evangelical, one of the things that makes an evangelical faith wait different, possibly, than others, [is] there's an emphasis on the personal. In that location's an emphasis on the individual nature of salvation. At that place are unlike phrases for having a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. But it'southward ultimately about each person every bit an individual making what we would call a religion decision; deciding if indeed you lot ascribe to this theology or not, if indeed you believe that Jesus is who he claimed to exist, and that he is divine, and if that makes a departure in your life. … 2d, another authentication of evangelicals is yous go a sense that there is 1 source of religious truth. Over again, this gets back to biblical authority. Merely there's that idea of the Bible is the truth and the Bible is the ane path to eternal life. Evangelical Christians are going to be much more, I recall, in unison telling yous that Christianity is the truth, and it is the fashion to eternal life, and it's not one of multiple options. And then if you believe Christianity is truth by definition, from an evangelical perspective, it ways that other understandings of the divine are simulated. I remember that's, once again, a hallmark. Then finally -- and this is where the term comes from -- the whole idea of evangelizing, that you demand to tell others. If you believe that you know something is true and you believe it has eternal consequences, and then you want to share that with other people. Yous don't desire to simply agree that to yourself and exist silent about it. And then at that place is a sense of wanting to brand converts, wanting to let people know the Gospel, the proficient news, so that they would be a office of it, every bit well.


	Editor-in-Main, Beliefnet Evangelicals claim President Bush as their own. Notwithstanding Bush is a member of the United Methodist Church. Is Bush an evangelical or is he a Methodist, or is he both? Can you be both? You certainly can be evangelical and Methodist. I recall a lot of people presume that evangelical means Baptist. Just evangelical is a style, and an approach to your personal faith that actually cuts across a lot of different Christian denominations. In fact, a lot of evangelical churches now are non-denominational. Distinctions like Methodist, or Presbyterian are less important than they used to be. And then y'all tin be evangelical and be a Methodist. Would y'all say Bush is an evangelical? I think if you look at the definition, the characteristics of an evangelical, he pretty much fits information technology. He talks about having a personal relationship with God. He talks about having had a transformational experience. He talks about the centrality of the Bible in his life. The only feature of evangelicals that he probably wouldn't say he has is the obligation to evangelize. And equally he has appropriately said, that'due south not really the proper role for the president of the United states. But in three out of four of the characteristics that you often see of evangelicals, he fits the neb. Why doesn't he phone call himself an evangelical or a born again? I retrieve for political reasons, probably. That he knows that the word "evangelical," in some sectors, is a scary word. And that the word "born again," I some sectors, is a scary word. And so he talks about the importance of God, which is really kind of a popular concept, without talking near being evangelical or a born once more, or part of the religious correct, or anything similar that, that carries baggage.


	Professor, Wheaton Higher Tell me what information technology means to be evangelical. I of the jokes that evangelicals like to tell is that you know y'all're an evangelical if liberals think yous're a fundamentalist and if fundamentalists think y'all're a liberal. There is something of that middle ground character to evangelicalism. 1 of the things that people often say is that in that location are 4 characteristics that marker evangelicals. But it seems to me that at that place are 2 that you lot can grab hold of that are about important. One is the belief that the Bible is the give-and-take of God, that information technology is authoritative, it's binding upon u.s.a., that we need to exist obedient to it. The other thing is an emphasis on evangelism on the idea that the Gospel is not just for a few, but for everyone, and that it'south the job of anybody who is a Christian to let everyone else know virtually the good news of Jesus Christ. I call up all of u.s.a. would be committed to that in one way or another. Now, of grade, we volition so take some interesting conversations near what the Bible means. The fact that we are all committed to the authority of Scripture doesn't mean that we have exactly the aforementioned ideas near what every passage and Scripture means. We might take very different ideas about how information technology is that you're supposed to carry out the chore of evangelism. Some people are happy to stand up on street corners and pass out tracts. Other people would like to infiltrate organizations like PBS and piece of work from within the structures of power in our society. But those ii commitments, I call back, are really at the heart of what it ways to be an evangelical. … You said that a joke amongst evangelicals is -- liberals think you're a fundamentalist and fundamentalists think you're a liberal. So what is it about existence evangelical that makes evangelicals moderate? I'1000 not sure that many evangelicals would want to exist called moderate. Just if you practice look at a range of Christians, in which you take liberal Christians at ane end and central Christians at some other end, I gauge we're sort of in the middle in that location, and therefore occupy a kind of moderate position. Let's have a couple of examples that would illustrate this moderate character. Evangelicals are going to emphasize the authorisation of Scripture far more than than liberal Christians will. However, they are not so strict and non and so unanimous in their belief in how to interpret Scripture. Among fundamentalists, there would be almost universal consensus that the Book of Genesis is a literal historical narrative, that the cosmos was washed in six days. In fact, that's ane of the things that has historically marked fundamentalists -- this belief that Genesis is a very straightforward historical narrative. Evangelicals are not likely to exist so quick to come to that conclusion. In fact, these days maybe most evangelicals would not. That's hard-- I really don't take the information to back that up. Just I retrieve that is a fair guess. Withal we nevertheless believe the Genesis is not a completely mythical story, it'due south not a completely fictional story. It is a story which is rooted in certain kinds of historical truth. Simply it'due south not necessarily the half-dozen-day cosmos. I don't believe it's a six-day creation. I don't believe it'due south that sort of historic narrative. Merely I retrieve that there'southward still that commitment to reading Genesis as the word of God that you would not necessarily discover in liberal Christians. And so there'south one instance in which there is this kind of moderate-- Proverb that the Bible is the truth, something that was written and gathered together and then many years ago -- doesn't that experience a flake archaic to you as a professor, every bit an academic intellectual thinker? How do you really say that that'southward the truth? I retrieve everyone who claims that the Bible is truth lays hold of that claim past faith. But information technology'south no uninformed faith, and it'south not religion that is unmarked by reflection and serious intellectual engagement. Only it would be dishonest not to say that at that place is a very strong element of making a commitment to the dominance of Scripture and testing it out, seeing how it works. It's non something that very many people would come to automatically or easily. But it is something that's worth a endeavor, is what we would say. And then in that location is that job of measuring it, testing it to run across if it does reply to your experience and your beliefs, but as well, the other side of the coin -- testing your ain beliefs and your ain feel confronting what Scripture says. These are ancient books. They are very old. They come from a very foreign culture. It may seem odd to say that books that are so old can be authoritative for us today. Simply I think one of the things that evangelicals tend to believe, or believe pretty strongly actually is in what Grand.K. Chesterton called the "democracy of the dead," the idea that we, in the early on xx-commencement century Western world, practice not take a monopoly on truth. We're very enlightened of all the ways in which we have learned things that are unknowable to previous cultures and perhaps even to other cultures that exist today. Nosotros're very aware of all the knowledge that we have that our predecessors and that our neighbors in other parts of the world don't take. Simply it's very hard for nearly of the states to imagine that there may be things that other cultures knew, that other cultures know, and that past cultures knew that we have lost or that we accept forgotten. So information technology seems to me that there is something very consistent with being a serious intellectual and asking the question, "Do I really know everything? Practise people in my time and my place and my culture take a monopoly on the truth? Or might it not be possible that, if I really study advisedly these ancient writings, that I may notice that there is a wisdom there that is not accessible to me through whatever of the means that I normally use to get data in mod America?"


	Historian and professor, Wheaton Higher How would y'all define the word "evangelical?" "Evangelical" designates both a trait of churches, religious practices, networks. It designates a certain serial of convictions or actions, practices. The beginning of the modern movement and its American phase is in the mid-18th century, with revivals in the British Isles, North America, the Westward Indies. Jonathan Edwards, John and Charles Wesley, and George Whitefield are primal showtime figures. From those movements accept descended a wide assortment of religious organizations, churches and voluntary groups, and they are the evangelical motion. Only there are also a series of characteristics and designations, beliefs and practices -- of which four have been designated by the British historian, David Bebbington, and provide a very good summary designation of what evangelicals exercise and believe. His four characteristics are: a very potent belief in the Bible equally the primary religious authority; a commitment to the practice of conversion, so that people need to exist inverse in a Christian direction as a basis for participation in the life of God. The tertiary characteristic that he mentions is activism, especially a willingness to tell other people near the message of salvation in Jesus Christ. The fourth characteristic is a special cess of the work of Christ on the cross. The death and resurrection of Christ is the center of the Christian faith. These four characteristics do work quite well to designate a wide family of religious involvement. Are in that location certain denominations that fit underneath this, and others that don't? Evangelical is a slippery discussion, because it can be used to designate certain religious groups or denominations. Only and so it also tin can be used to transcend denomination. So there would be in the U.s.a. evangelical Presbyterians, evangelical Episcopalians, evangelical Lutherans. But there would also be lots of individual congregations that would exist evangelical in some general sense. The Southern Baptist Convention, which is the largest Protestant denomination in the Us, would certainly be evangelical. Although considering it is its own thing, and it'south so big in the southeastern part of the state and large in other parts of the country, many Southern Baptists do non use the word "evangelical" for themselves, though anybody exterior knows that they are. So the discussion is plastic. The concept is not precise. Evangelical movements have been identified and identifiable. Evangelicals recognize each other, frequently by how they sing hymns, and what hymns. But it'south not a hard and fast designation. The word "evangelical" does designate a express range of behavior and practices. But it's not a discussion similar Baptist or Presbyterian or Roman Catholic, because its designation is for a certain feature way of being religious. Evangelicals tend to operate against tradition, only at that place are some traditional evangelicals. Evangelicals historically have been opposed to the Roman Catholic Church. Today, in that location are Roman Catholics who call themselves evangelicals. So the word is flexible, simply it does accept a cadre of meanings that have been associated with it.

home · introduction · president and his religion · america'southward evangelicals · interviews give-and-take · producer'southward chat · links & readings · press reaction · tapes & transcripts credits · instructor's guide · privacy policy FRONTLINE home · wgbh · pbsi posted april 29, 2004 FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of wgbh educational foundation. photo copyright © brooks kraft/corbis spider web site copyright 1995-2014 WGBH educational foundation